I along with other those who called out of the addition of Waverly with this list had been literally called shitty by the individual you describe as diplomatic, that has been the true point once I stopped being good. Funny how you’re OK with that but need from me personally a proof of my good might, expecting I’ll invest hours searching for and making screenshots of my terms and upload it with a server just so that you would state it doesn’t matter anyway since you don’t view it as any evidence. In the same way being called that is“shitty “diplomatic behavior” in this alt-reality.

And that’s just what angers me the absolute most concerning this situation. Gaslighting and dual criteria. Calling away listing as bisexual the type who’s most likely gay – as she also utilized the term to spell it out herself – can be an attack on bisexual individuals now (that’s why we talked about insinuation of biphobia in addition, but of program we bet you didn’t view it in that way either exactly like name-calling is diplomatic) and now we shouldn’t have any difficulty because “who’s harmed by that”. Then your description this is certainly harmful because lesbian presence is with in really bad state of program contributes to accusation that dealing with lesbians is hi-jacking bi-visibility week. You actually don’t see any problem for the reason that?

And another of the very disingenuous arguments, we make an effort to forbid bi fans from seeing Wav as bi because a write-up for a site that is renowned at queer females is simply the identical to a viewpoint of an admirer! Except it is perhaps maybe perhaps not. When folks see an impression they’ll be got by it so it’s already formal. Which often can lead to huge strain on the authors and showrunners to adhere to that even they planned, or they’ll face the fan wrath if it’s not what. And that’s really shitty.

Provided the time you’re taking to argue that this really isn’t a grudge carried over from a bi/lesbian fandom war but really a neutral argument from an individual who is reasonable to all or any, i do believe it is a lot more than fair for me personally to inquire of one to straight back up that claim. You don’t require a screenshot, just copy/paste something accusatory you’ve written re:bisexual erasure and url to the content it is from.

I’ll come back to Laura R’s presumably antagonistic line: “I think it is fine for gay/lesbian individuals to claim her, but We also think it is just a little shitty for all your people within the responses to grumble about other people claiming Waverly as bi.”

This comment accepts that lesbians have actually the right to claim Waverly, which hits me as pretty diplomatic. She’s maybe maybe not arguing that lesbians shouldn’t just claim her that bi females could also achieve this and that yes, it is unneeded to insistently refuse to just accept that bi women may claim this character too. When comprehended inside the context associated with the comment that is entire small shitty’ is not specially confrontational and on occasion even suggest. Also so I think it’s disingenuous to pretend that your tone escalated in response to others when in fact it was accusatory from the get-go if I were to accept that ‘a little shitty’ is a shitty word choice, Laura R.’s comment came hours after your first comment about how calling Waverly bi means that all queer women are bisexual by default. How do I be gaslighting you as soon as the time stamps from all of these commentary are plainly noticeable?

Again, the standard argument that this character is truly homosexual rather than bi, is itself perhaps perhaps not ‘a small shitty’. In reviewing the proof presented, I’m inclined to concur with you that Waverly might not be bi. What’s shitty, is you’ve twisted this as a full situation of lesbian erasure as well as the presumption that Heather believes we’re all bisexual by standard. There are some other choices that may give an explanation for choice to incorporate Waverly in this list:

-it’s too soon to provide her any label at all -Heather has another type of interpretation that she will fairly backup since the proof does not instantly point out a single summary -Heather, a television author and also require use of promo materials from showrunners etc, has a document someplace by having a blurb by which Waverly is referred to as bisexual -Heather made an error because she actually is individual, and may even opt to eliminate Waverly through the list or explain her as being a lesbian in the foreseeable future